Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Sexually confused must embrace Zionism, says World Jewish Congress


🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨WARNING🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
IMMODESTY
DEGENERATE FILTH
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨WARNING🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨


“After decades of LGBTQ Jews fighting for full inclusion in Jewish spaces, LGBTQ Jews now find themselves fighting for inclusion in LGBTQ spaces, with repeated challenges from BDS activists seeking to co-opt the LGBTQ and progressive movement in America. This phenomenon must end – it is time to bring Zionism back into the LGBTQ discourse and to demand that a movement that thrives on inclusivity not exclude its members over their support for the State of Israel.”
— WJC CEO and Executive Vice President Robert Singer —




source: World Jewish Congress, World Jewish Congress co-hosts LGBTQ n' Z: A Conversation About Pride, Zionism, and Inclusivity

Thanks to Henry Makow for bringing this to our attention!

Oh, the irony...

Now, ask your questions


Tomorrow another (we’ve lost count) interview book with Francis will be released in Italy.  It is titled, Adesso fate le vostre domande (Now, ask your questions), and subtitled, Conversazioni sulla Chiesa e sul mondo di domani (Conversations on the Church and on the world of tomorrow).   

In the preface Francis writes the reason for his countless interviews.  He wants a church of dialogue, one that is “the church of Emmaus, in which the Lord ‘interviews’ the disciples who are walking discouraged.”  He continues, “I desire a church that knows how to insert itself into the conversations of people, that knows how to dialogue.”  Francis then states this is how he communicates to his ‘parish’, “It is a way of communicating my ministry and I tie these conversations in the interviews with the daily homilies in Santa Marta, which is — let's say it like this — my ‘parish.’”

Recall, that in December 2014 interview with Elisabetta Piqué that Francis said, “I’m constantly making statements, giving homilies. That’s magisterium. That’s what I think, not what the media say that I think. Check it out; it’s very clear.”  Wow, one would think that Francis would choose his words carefully during these interviews but that is not the case, “For me, interviews are a dialog, not a lecture. For this reason I do not prepare.”  “Sometimes I receive the questions in advance but I almost never read or think over them.  Other times, in the plane press conferences, I imagine the questions they might ask me. But to respond I need to encounter the people and look into their eyes.”  When Francis is making these off-the-cuff magisterial proclamations he understands that his revolutionary ideas might not be understood properly, “Yes, I have a fear of being poorly interpreted but, I repeat, I want to run this pastoral risk.”

Finally, Francis explains that interviews are really encounters with the public, “I need to have this communication with people.  I have a true need of this direct communication with people. Giving an interview ... means having an encounter with journalists who often ask you questions taken from the people.”  Besides the newly written preface the book consists of eight interviews and Q & A sessions: the 2013 interview with Antonio Spadaro; the 2016 interview with Ulf Jonsson; the 2015 dialogue with Jesuits in the Philippines; and the 2016 dialogue with Jesuits in Poland.  One can be confident that Francis will not directly answer any of the five questions sent to him by the four cardinals (Caffarra, Burke, Brandmuller, and Meisner) inbetween the covers of the book.  Once again Francis shows that his words are hollow and he is an echo chamber of hypocrisy.

“It is true that I do not give interviews, but why, I do not know, I can’t, it’s just like that. For me it is quite an effort to do so, but I thank all of you here.”



Nothing symbolizes a ‘Potemkin Papacy’ better than a cardboard Francis.


*Francis doesn’t believe Catholics should #bemultiplied, only Talmudists.

Monday, October 16, 2017

Why is abortion the ‘Law of the land’ in America?




Michael A. Hoffman II writes in, America is under Talmudic law, not Sharia law:

“Pursuers come in all shapes and sizes. They can even be Judaic children. Americans have often expressed dismay and amazement at how, in 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court did not only legalize abortion at 12 or 16 weeks gestation. The Court, in conformity with the Talmud, legalized abortion on demand at any time during the pregnancy, including a few minutes before the baby is born. This abominable crime is permissible in those lands where the Talmud exerts dominion.

The relevant halacha is found in the uncensored text of the Talmud Bavli (“Bavli” denotes Babylon), in Sanhedrin 72b, where a mother believes her unborn baby is endangering her life by “pursuing” her. According to the Talmud, this unborn infant rodef can be eliminated at any time during the pregnancy, except when the mother is actually giving birth and the head of the child becomes visible.

“Before the baby is born, it is not considered a living soul, and it is therefore not subject to the halakhot (law) of murder.” — Koren Talmud Bavli: Sanhedrin Part Two (Jerusalem, 2017), p. 155.

Right wing campaigners against the alleged imminent imposition of Sharia law announce that they are defending the “Constitution against Islam.” We have never seen a case where Islamic law profoundly influenced members of the Supreme Court. We have, however, observed repeated Talmudic influence over how the court interprets the Constitution in the modern era. Roe v. Wade is one example. Another is the “discovery” of a Constitutional right to legalize the marriage of sodomites. It goes without saying that the Founders envisioned no such right, just as the Bible made no allowance for a usurping Talmud. 

In the religion that is directed by the Talmud, there is no legislature. All laws are made by judicial decision. It just so happens that this is how much of the supreme law of the land is made in America. Another name for “activist judge” is Talmudic judge.

Our nation is under Talmudic law, not Sharia, though immense troops of Protestant and Catholic ignoramuses display their cluelessness as they crusade with intense fervor against a non-existent menace, while oblivious to the cancer eating at the bowels of our nation. 

One wants to be charitable. One hesitates to overtax rhetoric and apply the word idiocy to the victims of what is a constantly mutating virus of deception that has hoodwinked them and 99% of the conservative movement. In lieu of such rhetoric, an observation of C. Wright Mills comes to mind, “We are at a curious juncture in the history of human insanity.””
source: On the Contrary, America is under Talmudic law, not Sharia law

 source: Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, Volume 1, 
ABORTION & MISCARRIAGE, pp. 8 - 9 

*Keep in mind that the editor of the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D., was appointed personally by Francis to the Pontifical Academy Of Life on 13 June 2017. This appointment of a Talmudist and Francis’ near silence on abortion tells one all they need to know about the direction the Novus Ordo is heading.






For additional information see, Life and Potential Life: Abortion in Jewish Tradition.



Sunday, October 15, 2017

Fatima profaned with multimedia light show

On October 12th, 13th, and 14th at midnight the facade of the Basilica of Our Lady of the Rosary at Fatima in Fatima, Portugal was profaned with a light show. Titled, Fátima — Tempo de Luz (“Fatima — Time of Light”), it was reminiscent of the Fiat Lux which profaned St. Peter’s Basilica on 8 December 2015.  The multimedia light show purports to tell the story of Fatima over 100 years in seven scenes. This is how the Novus Ordo choose to commemorate the Centenary of the 6th Apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Cova da Iria and the Miracle of the Sun. Below is a preview of this multimedia extravaganza. Look for Francis, ‘the bishop in white’, at the 7 minutes and 51 seconds mark. We leave the reader with one question... Is nothing sacred any more?


The False Lights of Fatima